
In cybersecurity, especially within SOC and DFIR roles, analysts are constantly surrounded by noise: high alert volume, repetitive log parsing, IOC triage, case documentation β and yes, even repetitive job application tasks. The solution? Automation.
This post breaks down a Python script I wrote to automate the process of tailoring cover letters, resumes, and outreach messages for different roles. But beyond job hunting, itβs a blueprint for how automation principles apply directly to real-world cybersecurity operations.
π Why Automate?
In security operations, analysts often automate:
- Parsing log files for patterns
- Replacing indicators across datasets
- Pivoting on artifacts in threat hunts
- Building reports from templated data
This script mirrors those same patterns. It:
- β
Replaces dynamic values in
.docxtemplates - β Maintains text formatting (critical in styled documents)
- β Structures outputs with naming consistency
- β Generates role-specific communication templates
These are the same principles used in incident response scripts or detection engineering pipelines.
π§ How the Script Works
π§© 1. Placeholder Mappings
cover_replacements = {
'[[JOB_TITLE]]': job_title,
'[[COMPANY_NAME]]': company_name,
'[[CONTACT_TITLE]]': contact_title,
'[[LAST_NAME]]': last_name
}
Structured mappings allow the script to search and replace pre-defined placeholders. This is similar to replacing variables in detection logic or IOC sweep templates.
π 2. Handling Styled Documents
def replace_runs(runs):
full_text = ''.join(run.text for run in runs)
for old, new in cover_replacements.items():
full_text = full_text.replace(old, new)
if runs:
runs[0].text = full_text
for run in runs[1:]:
run.text = ''
MS Word documents store styled text in “runs.” If you donβt handle them properly, your replacements break formatting. This function preserves the formatting by:
- β Merging all runs into a single string
- β Performing replacements
- β Updating only the first run (and clearing the rest)
In security automation, similar logic applies when:
- Preserving formatting in logs and SIEM exports
- Cleaning artifacts without losing context
- Preserving metadata during forensic triage
π 3. Paragraph-Level Replacements in Resumes
def replace_placeholder_text(paragraph):
full_text = paragraph.text
replaced = False
for old, new in resume_replacements.items():
if old in full_text:
full_text = full_text.replace(old, new)
replaced = True
if replaced:
for run in paragraph.runs:
run.text = ''
if paragraph.runs:
paragraph.runs[0].text = full_text
Unlike cover letters, resumes often use full paragraphs for summaries. This method respects that structure β the way many detection rules or Sysmon logs are formatted.
πΎ 4. Safe File Naming for Output Management
safe_job = job_title.replace(" ", "_")
safe_company = company_name.replace(" ", "_")
base_name = f"{safe_job}({safe_company})"
Well-named files arenβt just a preference β theyβre critical in SOC/DFIR workflows, especially when managing:
- Log exports
- Case documentation
- Evidence chains
π¬ 5. Outreach Message Templates
cold_contact_message = f"""
Hi {contact_title} {last_name},
I hope you're doing well. My name is Adam Gardner, and Iβm reaching out to express interest in the {job_title} role at {company_name}.
...
"""
Though technically simple, this function reinforces the idea that even communication processes can (and should) be templated and automated β like analyst-to-IR team handoff emails or daily SOC digests.
π Real-World Cybersecurity Applications
| Script Feature | Security Application |
|---|---|
| Placeholder replacement | IOC tagging, artifact renaming |
| Run-level text control | Styled threat reports, alert content cleanup |
| Paragraph scanning | Forensic log parsing, rule templating |
| Safe file naming | Evidence management, case documentation |
| Message templating | Incident handoff messages, team status notes |
Automation doesnβt always need to involve a threat feed or a YARA scan. Itβs a mindset β optimizing for consistency, accuracy, and efficiency in everything you do.
π‘ Final Thoughts
This script may have been built for job applications, but it reflects how analysts should think about operational tasks inside the SOC. Every repetitive action β whether it’s parsing alerts or updating templates β is an opportunity to code it once and reuse it often.
This is how real-world cybersecurity work scales:
Not just through tools β but through automation-driven thinking.
Leave a comment