Ramblings of a CyberSecurity Nerd

Splunk Survival Series – Part 1: Taming the Data Deluge

Welcome to the first entry in the Splunk Survival Series — your operations-grade guide to turning overwhelming logs into usable threat intelligence. This isn’t a tutorial. It’s a field manual. If you’ve ever stared at a blank Splunk search bar and thought, “Where the hell do I start?” — this one’s for you.

📌 Visibility Context

Before you write your first SPL query, you need to understand what logs you actually have. Most environments are flooded with raw, miscategorized, or noisy data — and if you don’t know your indexes, you’re hunting blind.

  • Product: Splunk Enterprise / Splunk Cloud
  • Use Case: Log visibility, data source awareness, SOC readiness
  • Analyst Scope: Tier 1–2 SOC, Detection Engineering, Threat Hunting

🔬 Understanding the Data Stack

Splunk ingests logs into indexes. These are your battle zones. Knowing what’s in them — and what’s missing — determines whether you can investigate threats effectively.

index=* 
| stats count by index 
| sort -count

This shows which indexes are flooding the system and where your signal might actually be. Don’t assume you have logs — verify it.

Next, check what sourcetypes exist per index. This helps narrow down what tools are sending what data:

index=wineventlog 
| stats count by sourcetype

📎 Analyst Behavior Snapshot

This is what many junior analysts do — and what breaks visibility:

  • Sends: Raw keyword search like "login failed"
  • System does: Scans millions of events, ignores field structure, returns a mess
  • What comes back: Irrelevant logs, performance drain, no signal

Compare that to a proper field-driven search:

index=wineventlog EventCode=4625 
| stats count by user, host

Same intent — radically different signal-to-noise ratio.

🧪 Splunk Fundamentals to Master

Your core search toolkit starts here:

  • stats: Aggregate and count events by field
  • timechart: Trend events over time
  • table: Present results in human-readable form
index=proxy status=403 
| timechart span=1h count by src_ip

This lets you visually detect scraping, blocked access, or outbound anomalies — without scanning individual logs.

🌐 Suricata/Zeek Parallel Thinking

Think of Splunk like Zeek — it’s not about packet-by-packet logs, it’s about structured event streams. If you’re not filtering fields like src_ip, dest_port, or user, you’re wasting cycles.

⚡ Sigma-Like Thinking in Splunk

If you were to write a Sigma rule, you’d key off structured log fields. Bring the same discipline to Splunk:

index=wineventlog EventCode=4625 
| stats count by user, src_ip 
| where count > 5

This becomes the basis of failed login brute-force detection — without a dedicated rule engine.

📊 Live Query Examples

# Top failed users by system
index=wineventlog EventCode=4625 
| stats count by user, host

# Blocked web traffic by domain
index=proxy action=blocked 
| stats count by dest_domain

# Remote desktop usage
index=firewall dest_port=3389 
| stats count by src_ip, dest_ip

🛠️ SOC Search Strategy

  • Tier 1: Stick to saved searches, dashboards, and proven SPL blocks
  • Tier 2: Start building summaries with stats, timechart, and use eval for logic
  • Tier 3: Correlate events across sourcetypes and indexes — build your own detection logic

🔐 Hardening Analyst Workflow

  • Ban raw keyword searches from production workflows
  • Train all analysts to use field-based filtering by default
  • Use Smart or Fast search modes — avoid Verbose unless debugging extractions
  • Document all core indexes, sourcetypes, and known gaps

📋 Incident Response Queries to Memorize

# Failed logons > 10 per IP
index=wineventlog EventCode=4625 
| stats count by src_ip 
| where count > 10

# Successful logon after failure
index=wineventlog (EventCode=4624 OR EventCode=4625) 
| stats count by user, EventCode

# User account usage across systems
index=* user="jsmith" 
| stats count by host, sourcetype

📚 Suggested Reading & Resources

🧾 Final Thoughts

Splunk doesn’t make you smart — it shows you how smart you already are. But only if you structure your data, filter your signal, and stop relying on string searches. The best SOC analysts don’t memorize SPL — they understand how to ask the right question. And they know what data they have before they even type the first pipe.

In the next post, we’ll break into field logic, conditional filtering, and eval-based triage queries to start slicing the data into useful decisions.

Published: August 18, 2025

Leave a comment